Aug 2010, 23:03 Primary OS: Mac OS X other VBox Version: PUEL Guest OSses: Windows 7, Ubuntu 10. George georgefreeman Posts: 1 Joined: 17. Does this matter to anyone except gamers? Puzzling that 32-bit Windows performed better via VirtualBox than 64-bit via Boot Camp.Įxcecutive Summary: VirtualBox seems good, except for the graphics. 64-bit Windows 7 via Boot Camp gave the same scores as 32-bit except Processor improved from 4.3 to 4.6 and RAM improved from 4.7 to 4.8. Note: VirtualBox graphics scores were the same both with and without the "experimental" 3D graphics guest addition enabled. I ran VirtualBox and Fusion guests on an external USB hard disc Boot Camp on the internal SSD.įor VirtualBox and Fusion, I allocated 0.75 GB RAM to the Windows 7 guest and 1.25 GB RAM to the OS X host. I have a MacBook Air running OS X 10.6.4 with 2 GB RAM and 1.8 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo CPU. VirtualBox has created a virtual environment for us to install Windows 10 in that will actually perform the install on the external drive. I recently ran the "Windows Experience" benchmark (accessible via Control Panel) for 32-bit Windows 7 on VirtualBox 3.2.8, Fusion 3.1.1, and Boot Camp 3.1. Select the bootcamp.vmdk file, click the Open button and then click the Create button.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |